Economics, ideology and the possibility of endogenous development

Michael A. Lebowitz

Resumen


ECONOMIC theory is not neutral, and the results when it is followed owe much to the implicit and explicit assumptions embedded in particular theories. That such assumptions reflect specific ideologies is most obvious in the case of the neoclassical economics that underlies neo-liberal economic policies.

Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


Galbraith, John Kenneth: American Capitalism. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1952.

Himmelweit, Sue: ‘The Individual as Basic Unit of Analysis,’ in Francis Green and Petter Nore: Economics: An Anti-Text. London: MacMillan, 1977.

Lebowitz, Michael A.: ‘Paul M. Sweezy’ in Maxine Berg: Political Economy in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Philip Allan, 1990.

Lebowitz, Michael A.: Beyond Capital: Marx’s Political Economy of the Working Class. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.

Meek, Ronald: Economics of Physiocracy: Essays and Translations. Cambridge: Harvard, 1963.

Smith, Adam: The Wealth of Nations. New York: Modern Library, 1937.

Veblen, Thorstein: ‘Why is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?’ in Veblen.

The Place of Science In Modern Civilization and Other Essays. (1919) republished as Veblen on Marx, Race, Science and Economics. New York: Capricorn, 1969.


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Economía y Desarrollo (Impresa)

Licencia de Creative Commons
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.

ISSN 2518-0983 (En línea)    ISSN 0252-8584 (Impresa)    RPNS: 0009